Search for: "Neil Siegel" Results 81 - 100 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Thomas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2014, Forthcoming).Vivian Grosswald Curran, Reviving Human Rights Legislation After Kiobel, (American Journal of International Law, Vol. 107, p. 858, 2013).Neil Siegel, Federalism as a Way Station: Windsor as Exemplar of Doctrine in Motion, (February 14, 2014). [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:05 am by JB
The Internet and digital media, which blend traditional legal experts, journalists, commentators, and the general public, have, if anything, enhanced these features of American constitutional culture.The all-star cast of participants includes: Bruce Ackerman (Yale), Akhil Amar (Yale), Jack Balkin (Yale), Emily Bazelon (Yale, Slate), Joan Biskupic (Reuters News), Sujit Choudhry (NYU), Justin Driver (Texas, New Republic), Garrett Epps (University of Baltimore, American Prospect), Barry Friedman (NYU),… [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
On the contrary, as argued in an amicus brief on behalf of civil procedure/con-law/federal courts professors Yours Truly, Helen Herskoff (NYU), Gillian Metzger (Columbia), Neil Siegel (Duke), and David Strauss (U Chicago), far from containing a vehicle problem, Whole Woman’s Health presents a vehicle opportunity. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 7:48 am by Jonathan R. Siegel
Siegel is Professor of Law at George Washington University Law School. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The case for a “collective action federalism” of this sort has been made at greater length by Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter in the Stanford Law Review, and by Professor Siegel on these pages. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:58 pm by JB
Marty Lederman has offered a splendid analysis of the individual mandate issues here, and, of course, readers of this blog know that Andy Koppelman, Neil Siegel, and I have gone over the doctrinal arguments many times before.So for a change of pace, I point out that, if we use regime theory in political science, the most likely prediction is that a majority of the Justices will defend the basic commitments of the current constitutional regime, which is the New Deal/civil rights… [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 6:07 am by Jim Sedor
” by Neil Thomas for Texas Tribune Elections Maine: “Maine Regularly Sells Voter Data It Denied to Feds” by Scott Thistle for Governing [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 9:19 am
I understand Neil Siegel to be making largely a mode 1 argument. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Or BassokIn a recent post, Neil Siegel describes a “major concern expressed during the partisan gerrymandering litigation before the Supreme Court over the past two terms”— “that the Court’s public legitimacy may suffer if it holds that federal courts may adjudicate the merits of political gerrymandering claims. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 1:03 pm by Steve Gottlieb
And in an article on an on-line forum, Neil Siegel wrote “The consequentialist concern that traditionalists will be branded as bigots is sufficiently serious for Justice Alito that it counts as a reason for the Court to reject” constitutional claims. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 2:35 pm by James Fox
Connecticut Then and Now, with Cary Franklin, Melissa Murray,  Doug NeJaime,  and Neil Siegel speaking, and Isabel Medina and Reva B. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm by Andrew Hamm
At Balkinization, Curtis Bradley and Neil Siegel analyze what role, if any, “constitutional conventions” should play in the selection of a successor. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
A version of these will appear in the 2012 Supplement to Brest, Levinson, Balkin, Amar and Siegel, Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking (5th edition). [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:35 am by Guest Blogger
Neil Siegel and Reva SiegelFor the Conference on Liberty/Equality: The View from Roe’s 40th and Lawrence’s 10th Anniversaries Roe v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:38 pm
Posted by Mike Dorf My latest Verdict column is co-authored with Duke Law & Poli Sci Professor Neil Siegel.   [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:04 am by Kurt Lash, guest-blogging
In brief, the paper argues that recent efforts to make an historical case for using Resolution VI of the original Virginia Plan as the fundamental principle for construing federal power under Article I, Section 8 are fatally flawed due to both historical omission and historical error.I am pleased to join Neil Siegel as a co-guest blogger on the subject of Resolution VI, and in later posts I plan on responding to Neil’s comments. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:17 am by Nabiha Syed
Sebelius, Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter discuss their theory of the tax power and how it justifies the Chief Justice’s analysis. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:17 am by Nabiha Syed
Sebelius, Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter discuss their theory of the tax power and how it justifies the Chief Justice’s analysis. [read post]