Search for: "New Jersey v. Allen"
Results 81 - 100
of 174
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2013, 9:28 pm
New Jersey and held that facts which increase the maximum sentence must be submitted to the jury for proof beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Kan. 1984) Allen v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
New Jersey holding that, no matter what they are called, "facts which increase a range of penalties to which a criminal defendant is exposed" must be proved to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt. p 490. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:56 am
Jacobson; and Allen R. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:02 pm
New Jersey, the Court majority has ruled repeatedly that, if a fact is going to lead to an enhanced sentence, prosecutors have to prove that to the jury and must do so by satisfying the toughest legal standard: beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 11:15 am
March 8, 2012 Gantman, Allen, and Mundy, J.J.) [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 11:32 am
In a different criminal securities fraud case, New Jersey stock trader Mark Allen Lefkowitz is facing up to 25 years behind bars and a $250,000 fine for defrauding a company’s shareholders of over $28 million. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:01 am
., v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:59 am
., v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:03 pm
” Allen v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
District Court Judge Gary Allen Feess, Central District of California in Los Angeles, denied CBS Broadcasting’s application for a temporary restraining order that would have prevented ABC from airing the premier broadcast of its new reality series “Glass House”. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 11:34 am
Several years ago, I had an unusual workman’s compensation case, pending in Salem County, New Jersey. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:30 am
Tex. 1990), aff'd sub. nom., U.S. v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
There was a news stor [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
New Jersey, that a judge may increase a sentence only if the enhancement is based upon facts found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:41 am
Allen v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
Cir. 2007) Eyewitness Testimony State of New Jersey v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:24 am
See Conte v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:32 am
June 25, 2008) (no claim under New Jersey product liability statute); Yurcic v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:24 am
In Allen v. [read post]
