Search for: "Nicholas Bagley"
Results 81 - 100
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In an article published in the Michigan Law Review, Professor Nicholas Bagley of the University of Michigan Law School argued that certain procedural constraints within administrative law should be eliminated as counterproductive and unnecessary. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
In a new paper, Julian Davis Mortenson and Nicholas Bagley of the University of Michigan Law School argue that the founders had no objection to Congress delegating the power to make rules, as long as it did not permanently abdicate its legislative responsibilities. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
Nicholas Bagley is Professor of Law at University of Michigan Law School. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am
” At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses whether the Court could opt to stay King v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
“Because of how we’ve structured our health-care system, the FDA’s decision will effectively transfer many billions of dollars of government and patient money to a single drug manufacturer,” wrote Sachs and Nicholas Bagley, a law professor at the University of Michigan, in their co-authored column for The Atlantic. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:09 am
” The rule, argue Sachs and co-authors Nicholas Bagley of the University of Michigan and Darius N. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:41 am
” And in The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley argues that, if the Court invalidates the subsidies, “any suggestion Congress will just clean up the mess should be taken with a huge grain of salt. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 5:01 am
At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley contends that several of the Court’s decisions “require Congress to speak with much greater clarity before the courts will impute to it the desire to behave so disrespectfully toward the states. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:45 pm
It’s a privilege to engage in this discussion with Kristin Collins, William Novak, Nicholas Bagley, Jon Michaels, and Gautham Rao. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:26 am
Klein and Nicholas J. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
Klein and Nicholas J. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 4:11 am
In an homage to canons of interpretation, Michigan lawprof Nicholas Bagley made an impassioned plea in the New York Times for the Supreme Court to ignore the words of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 10:25 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a forthcoming paper for the Michigan Law Review, Nicholas Bagley of the University of Michigan Law School urged administrative lawyers to question the assumption that strict procedural rules are essential to ensure governmental legitimacy and prevent agency capture. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 9:05 pm
Constitution limits Congress’s ability to delegate legislative authority to administrative agencies—cannot be squared with the founders’ original understanding of the Constitution, according to Julian Davis Mortenson and Nicholas Bagley of the University of Michigan Law School. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
But as Professors Julian Mortenson and Nicholas Bagley have demonstrated in a lengthy and important law review article, at the Founding, Congress gave federal agencies broad powers to make all kinds of important decisions. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses the prospect that the Court could stay its decision in King (and the possible effects of such a stay), while at the National Review Online’s Bench Memos Michael Cannon argues that “the Court will have to lower the bar quite a bit to find the ACA’s Exchange provisions coercive. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
Commentary comes from Marty Lederman at Balkinization, Jeffrey Toobin in The New Yorker, Nicholas Bagley in The New York Times, Robert Schlesinger at U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:50 am
At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog, Nicholas Bagley highlights an amicus brief he and Samuel Bray submitted yesterday in Trump v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
” Nicholas Bagley weighs in with a post at The Incidental Economist, observing that to prevail the challengers in the case must “believe that the judges and commentators who read the statute differently than they do . . . are all behaving unreasonably. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am
Ronald Mann previewed the case for this blog, while in The New England Journal of Medicine Nicholas Bagley and Christopher Koller argue that the case “threatens to cripple these databases and other state initiatives that aim to improve the health care system. [read post]
