Search for: "PECK v. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 335
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Defendant’s argument as set out in the application notice, which criticised the Claimant’s choice to complain only about the Interception Meanings and not about the Dismissal Allegations, contravened the rule in Polly Peck (Holdings) Ltd v Trelford[1980] QB 1000 (CA), which states that where a publication contains two or more distinct defamatory imputations, the claimant can complain of one and the defendant may not defend that imputation by proving the… [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 7:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Jurisdiction) County of Amador, CA v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
” Heather Long for the Washington Post reports that Collins “said Sunday she would not vote for any judge who wanted to end access to abortion in the United States by overturning Roe v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 5:00 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer, Ashley Deeks
… Are there concerns that an individual's mental state might exacerbate risk? [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:10 pm by Aurora Barnes
The petition of the day is: Fort Peck Housing Authority v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 8:49 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2017-2018update.html Petition was filed in Fort Peck Housing Authority, et al., v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2017-2018update.htmlPetition was filed in Fort Peck Housing Authority, et al., v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 6:38 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Fort Peck Cert Petition Question presented: Whether an action for the restoration of grant in aid funds illegally recouped by the United States constitutes a suit for specific relief such that the United States’ sovereign immunity is waived pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, plaintiff has presented evidence of a “continuing wrong,” which is “deemed to have accrued on the date of the last wrongful act” (Leonhard v United States, 633 F2d 599, 613 [2d Cir 1980], cert denied 451 US 908 [1981]; Harvey, 34 AD3d at 364). [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Plaintiff Billiard Balls Management (Billiard) sufficiently stated a claim for legal malpractice. [read post]