Search for: "PITTS V. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 325
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark Earlier this week, media reports circulated that this past spring Google had exposed the private data of thousands of the Google+ social network users and then opted not to disclose the issue, in part because of concerns that doing so would draw regulatory scrutiny and cause reputational damage. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Government offers no meaningful distinction between this case and Pitt News. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:31 pm by Theodore Shaw
Pitts, each of which loosened the standard for ending court supervision of formerly de jure segregated school districts. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Since the precipitous drop in United States law school enrolments began close to a decade ago, enrolments system wide have been cut in half. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
Piwowar even went so far as to issue a formal statement about the lack of communication to him about the SEC data breach, stating:   “I commend Chairman Clayton for initiating an assessment of the SEC’s internal cybersecurity risk profile and approach to cybersecurity from a regulatory perspective. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
[9]  ·      Should corporations be held directly accountable for protecting certain human rights, rather than only indirectly through the nation-state as the traditional bearer of human rights obligations? [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:36 am by INFORRM
There were case comments on the Panopticon Blog by Tim Pitt-Payne and Christopher Knight. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  There’s evidence of the value Jamie’s work in the recent North Carolina Supreme Court case State v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
You went to Pitt Law during the late 80s, a time in which the libertarian legal movement had really begun to flourish, in large part because libertarians had gotten the chance to popularize their ideas (say, by debating “judicial restraint” conservatives in environments like the Federalist Society.) [read post]