Search for: "PITTS V. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 318
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
[9]  ·      Should corporations be held directly accountable for protecting certain human rights, rather than only indirectly through the nation-state as the traditional bearer of human rights obligations? [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:36 am by INFORRM
There were case comments on the Panopticon Blog by Tim Pitt-Payne and Christopher Knight. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  There’s evidence of the value Jamie’s work in the recent North Carolina Supreme Court case State v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
You went to Pitt Law during the late 80s, a time in which the libertarian legal movement had really begun to flourish, in large part because libertarians had gotten the chance to popularize their ideas (say, by debating “judicial restraint” conservatives in environments like the Federalist Society.) [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
First American Home Buyers Protection Corp., 732 F.3d 948 (9th Cir. 2013) (discussed here); Pitts v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:38 am by Debra A. McCurdy
Reed Smith presenters Paul Pitts and Trey Andrews will be discussing recently adopted and proposed changes to state and federal laws impacting telehealth. [read post]
26 May 2016, 3:31 pm by Lisa Baird
Reed Smith presenters Paul Pitts and Trey Andrews will be discussing recently adopted and proposed changes to state and federal laws impacting telehealth. [read post]