Search for: "Patterson v. New York" Results 81 - 100 of 237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2008, 6:07 pm
The New York Times Bits Blog has coverage, Mike Madison has an interesting high-level view, and IPTAblog has the complaint. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 8:33 am by Beth Graham
  According to Patterson, the company violated both the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Law. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:11 am by SHG
There’s an old saying in New York: There’s no justice on the Court of Appeals. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Thacker v Constantine Cannon, LLP 2023 NY Slip Op 32376(U) July 14, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155930/2018Judge: James d’Auguste it is too early for the court to decide who did what. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:56 am by Jeff Welty
The New York Times ran this interesting article this week. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:55 pm by royblack
When the County Courts in New York City were merged into the New York State Supreme Court in 1962 as part of a court reorganization in 1962, Leibowitz’s title changed to New York State Supreme Court Justice. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:25 am
, filed a chapter 11 petition in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm by Wolfgang Demino
LoBiondo, Patterson Belknap Webb and Tyler LLP, pro hac vice, Joshua Kipnees, Patterson Belknap Webb and Tyler LLP, pro hac vice & Peter W. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Schwartzman, Inc. v Pliskin, Rubano, Baum & Vitulli 2023 NY Slip Op 01812Decided on April 5, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department is a legal malpractice case concerning, as do so many other famous legal malpractice cases, real estate in New York. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:37 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Holmes crafted a press release that was published in the New York Post on April 7, 2009. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:16 am
The rule in New York has long been that if enough work can be completed that may only be used under the proposed permit the rights in the existing zoning have vested. [read post]