Search for: "Paul Cole" Results 81 - 100 of 350
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2006, 4:40 am
-authorized inquiry into Oil-for-Food, chaired by Paul Volcker, were all done in secret, with snippets released at the sole discretion of Volcker and his team. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
In The New York Review of Books, David Cole reviews three recent books on the Roberts Court – Uncertain Justice (by Laurence Tribe and former SCOTUSblog contributor Joshua Matz), In the Balance (by Mark Tushnet), and Scalia (by Bruce Murphy) – and concludes that “what most defines the Roberts Court may be its hostility to courts themselves. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 12:00 am by James Romoser
(Paul Waldman, The Washington Post) Supreme Court Leaves Americans Guessing About the Meaning of Tolerance (Kristen Waggoner, Newsweek) Barrett’s first term: ‘She may surprise some people’ (Pamela King, E&E News) Surprising Consensus at the Supreme Court ($) (David Cole, The New York Review) The post The morning read for Thursday, July 8 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Dennis Crouch
The guide is edited by Paul Cole and Stephen Jones. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:27 pm by Dennis Crouch
Milton’s approach builds upon Paul Cole’s 2008 post-KSR article also published in RIPL. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 11:21 am by By Adam Wahlberg
Michael Sirota of Cole Schotz Meisel Forman & Leonard makes it his business to work harder than the competition. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:34 am by Andrew Hamm
  Speakers will include Deborah Archer of New York Law School, David Cole of Georgetown Law, Ann Hodges of the University of Richmond, Alan Morrison of The George Washington University, and Kannon Shanmugam of Williams & Connolly, and will be moderated by this blog’s Amy Howe. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 12:57 am
See previous IPBiz posts: Obviousness: European problem and solution approach Obviousness in interferences; Chapman and the 14- hydroxy problem in oxycodone Interesting comment thread on Patently-O In part, the guest poster on Patently-O, Paul Cole, brings up themes from a 2008 article in JMRIPL: More detained comments on the suggestion are found in a paper on KSR that was published in the John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law in 2008[1]. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 8:43 am by Bridget Crawford
Elmendorf, UC Davis School of Law Paul A. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:05 am by Anna Christensen
Briefly: The ACLU’s Matt Coles, in the second installment of a two-part article at the Huffington Post, speculates on the possible outcomes if the California Prop 8 case were to reach the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:58 am by Adam Feldman
Separate opinion utility Looking back at some of the most impactful dissents as measured using Cole’s criteria, Justice John Paul Stevens’ dissent from Bowers v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 10:01 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Paul Stevens There were two strong dissents in the case. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 10:34 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
  I would also like to extend many thanks to my fellow panelists, James Dombach and Paul Merolla from the law firm Murphy & McGonigle, and to Bart Mallon of Cole-Frieman & Mallon for hosting. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 4:11 am by SHG
When Barney Frank and Ron Paul introduced a bill to decriminalize pot? [read post]