Search for: "Peer v. State of Delaware"
Results 81 - 100
of 105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2018, 9:43 am
V. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(Patent Prospector) US Patents Congress weighs patent specialisation for federal judges (Ars Technica) (Inventive Step) (Law360) (IP Spotlight) (Patent Prospector) M Lemley & B Sampat’s report ‘Examiner Characteristics and the Patent Grant Rate’ – experienced examiners allow more, cite less (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) PTO problems are not new; the more things change, the more they stay the same (Inventive Step) Peer to… [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am
As a percentage of housing value, Connecticut homeowners now pay 20 percent more than New Yorkers and almost 50 percent more than their Massachusetts peers. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:54 pm
In Palmore v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm
For example, a business in State A might sell into State B, but for whatever reason that income might not be taxed in State B, a throwback rule would subject the income from the sale into State B to State A’s corporate tax. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06 OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:09 am
Structural Shifts: concomitant widespread elimination of (i) supermajority voting requirements, (ii) staggered or classified board terms, and (iii) stockholder rights plans (often done to avoid or compromise likely stockholder proposals), accompanied by limitations on (iv) change-in-control executive severance agreements, along with (v) increased stockholder rights to call special stockholder meetings, in tandem with (vi) highly publicized proposals advocating multiflavored… [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 11:00 am
(more on the Wahaha v Danone dispute): (China Business Law Blog), What Global Players could learn from Wii v Vii [Nintendo's global new product launch mistakes]: (IPDragon), (China Law Blog), Junk Patents: (China Hearsay),Has your distributor (representative, manufacturer) in China registered your mark? [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:09 pm
Cancer Research sued Barr for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware on July 20, 2007. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:17 am
Blockstack is a blockchain platform with a goal of “sponsoring and commercializing an open-source peer-to-peer network using blockchain technologies to ultimately build a new network for decentralized applications. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm
On the public pension fund side, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) and the Florida State Board of Administration each support proxy access proposals. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
Emmerich, Sabastian V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 5:13 pm
See also Comerica Inc. v. [read post]
