Search for: "People v. Diaz"
Results 81 - 100
of 398
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2018, 8:52 am
The attorneys at LaBovick, LaBovick & Diaz can help you take the next steps, including determining whether other people who also ate at the restaurant and experienced food poisoning. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:13 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 4:08 pm
We see an attempt at such a defense in Diaz, Et Al v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:04 am
The first is the California Supreme Court’s ruling in People v Diaz, California Supreme Court No. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:30 am
The case is People v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 1:26 pm
Search: Warrant: Fourth Amendment: Exclusionary rule: Good faith: Data:In People v. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 9:14 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
Yesterday, the next hearing in Wikimedia Foundation v. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 4:02 pm
On February 15, 1990 the case of the People of the State of New York, Respondent v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 8:30 am
So what can possibly be at issue in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 2:16 pm
In Robert Young v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:33 pm
Today's IRAP v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:08 pm
I’ll have more to say about this shortly, but here are a few immediate thoughts: Padilla is kind of an interesting counterpoint to last year’s monumental Sixth Amendment ruling in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
Diaz, 922 F2d 998 (2nd Cir.). [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:26 am
People v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:18 am
People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 2:42 pm
As the Court of Appeals has explained, where a police officer has probable cause to believe that the driver of an automobile has committed a traffic violation, a stop does not violate the state or federal constitutions and neither the primary motivation of the officer nor a determination of what a reasonable traffic officer would have done under the circumstances is relevant akin to People v Robinson and Whren v United States. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 8:39 am
For example the Court of Appeals in People v Rawlins and People v Meekins (10 N.Y.3d 136 [2/19/2008]), considered how Crawford applies two categories of evidence: DNA reports and , fingerprints, comparisons. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
The Court then determined that this error was harmless, since the defendant had confessed.Whether the holding of People v Brown (13 NY3d 332) was correct will likely be decided by the Supreme Court in Williams v. [read post]
