Search for: "People v. Downing" Results 81 - 100 of 16,810
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2025, 10:33 am by Oliver Fairhurst
The case is Morley's (Fast Foods) Ltd v Nanthakumar & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 186. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 3:02 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 10 March 2025, Eady J handed down judgment in Prospect v Evans [2025] EWHC 499 (KB). [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
”[15] Shareholders are people too, however, and so one can argue that the permissive scope of corporate fiduciary duties should allow for the adoption of climate-friendly policies if they generally enhance shareholder “welfare” rather than profits.[16] Also, there is wiggle room in arguments favoring  the “long-term” interests of shareholders, though future generations of not-yet-existing “shadow shareholders” are unlikely to be included.[17]… [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 4:55 am by Steve Vladeck
As clarified by Justice Bushrod Washington on circuit in the landmark early case of Lockington v. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 3:13 pm by SEO Team
They might even reflect the opinions of the people who wrote the content they were trained on. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 12:30 pm by John Ross
It's going to be super swell, and some important people will be there. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 4:25 am by SHG
If the government’s actions are illegal in the same way across the nation, then the best way to get justice is to strike it down everywhere at once. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm by Lesley Wexler and Anthony Ghiotto
When President Donald Trump signed the Prioritizing Military Excellence Order, questions arose as to whether it would be a complete transgender service ban or a variation of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell regime. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 7:44 pm by Josh Blackman
Second Justice Brett Kavanaugh started off a bit rocky, and was more likely to vote with Chief Justice Roberts, though more recently, he has settled down to preserve certain legal principles. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 10:20 am by Ahilan Arulanantham
Khalil played a key part in were antisemitic and created a hostile environment for Jewish students at Columbia, the people with knowledge of the matter said. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 6:24 pm by Stephen Halbrook
  That's why, for instance, shooting ranges have Second Amendment protection, as Ezell v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 7:47 am by Eric Goldman
In response to the defendants’ argument “that requiring additional investigation into images tagged as ‘unconfirmed’ CSAM would chill providers’ content moderation and undermine Congressional intent,” the court responds only that “a review of § 2258A caselaw reveals that image-by-image human review is not uncommon,” though it acknowledges that some providers automate reports and that “minimizing the number of people who view CSAM is… [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 8:10 am by Amy Howe
” The Supreme Court also turned down an invitation to overrule the half-century-old framework, first outlined in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]