Search for: "People v. Garrett" Results 81 - 100 of 208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2018, 3:05 am by SHG
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gamble v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at Flowers v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:20 pm by Kevin Russell
After Garrett (which itself fell on the heels of Bush v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am by Amy Howe
” Coverage of Wearry v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps observes that the court’s decision in The American Legion v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps highlights a “surprise opinion” by a court of appeals judge in the decision at issue in Mckesson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
’” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that “the cases of two Arkansas inmates, Don William Davis and Bruce Earl Ward, sentenced to death by courts in that state” have raised the stakes in McWilliams v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am by Amy Howe
Texas in the end”; and Lisa Soronen, who at the NCSL Blog notes that the case “is about different things for different people. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 5:30 am by Savanna Nolan
The first five people to stop by her office (Room 828 in the Law Library) with the correct answer will get a prize! [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps explains why Epic Systems v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” On Friday the justices agreed to review Trump v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Atlantic (via How Appealing), Garrett Epps hopes the court will summarily reverse a “rogue court [that] has had four chances to apply a foundational First Amendment precedent, and has bobbled it each time[:] That mistake, in a case called Mckesson v. [read post]