Search for: "People v. Hill" Results 81 - 100 of 1,540
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2009, 3:16 am
The Court held that since, pursuant to Penal Law § 70.25 [2-a], the consecutive sentence was a direct consequence of the plea, the court's failure to advise the defendant at the time of the plea that his sentence would run consecutively to the undischarged sentence on his prior conviction prevented his plea from being knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v Hill,9 NY3d 189, 191 [2007], cert denied 553 US â€â [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:55 am
Twain’ Connecticut Yankee v. 63   Clarence had slumped to his knees before I had half finished.... [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am by Rebecca Griffiths, Olswang
This argument was successfully run in McCluskey v Edge Hill University (ET Case No. 2405206/07), (although ultimately the employer succeeded in defending the claim on the basis that such a PCP amounted to a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim). [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:21 pm
And indeed many restrictions focus on particular places — sidewalks outside people’s homes (Frisby v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:23 am
I think we can all agree that, emotionally, you've got a pretty steep hill to climb -- regardless of the potential merits of your arguments -- in convincing the Ninth Circuit that you deserve relief.Let me also add that you don't do yourself any favors, Ted, by representing yourself. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 10:29 am by STEPHEN HOLZER
The American Tradition Institute, a conservative legal action group, has field suit to block the testing (ATI v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:01 am by Orin Kerr
Choate, 576 F2d 165, 174-177 (9th Cir. 1978) (government arranged for “mail cover,” under which postal service provided government agency with information appearing on the face of envelopes or packages addressed to defendant); People v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm?”. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:20 am by Eugene Volokh
It turns out, though, that there’s one such defensive use incident I originally missed, but that yielded a Georgia Supreme Court decision just a few weeks ago, in Hill v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 7:10 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Supp. 2d 233, 253 n.14 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) and as connoting a racial meaning, see Hill v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm by Mark Litwak
 You can be liable for defaming an individual even if you do not name her.An interesting case is Leopold v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
Today the court hears oral argument in redistricting cases from Virginia and North Carolina, Bethune-Hill v. [read post]