Search for: "People v. Hill"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2020, 1:23 pm
And this seems consistent with Florida Star v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:59 am
Jennings v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 8:12 am
Forty years ago today, the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:16 am
The Court held that since, pursuant to Penal Law § 70.25 [2-a], the consecutive sentence was a direct consequence of the plea, the court's failure to advise the defendant at the time of the plea that his sentence would run consecutively to the undischarged sentence on his prior conviction prevented his plea from being knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v Hill,9 NY3d 189, 191 [2007], cert denied 553 US â€â [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:55 am
Twain’ Connecticut Yankee v. 63 Clarence had slumped to his knees before I had half finished.... [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am
This argument was successfully run in McCluskey v Edge Hill University (ET Case No. 2405206/07), (although ultimately the employer succeeded in defending the claim on the basis that such a PCP amounted to a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim). [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 6:35 am
People v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 9:37 am
On Friday, a federal judge (in Hill v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:21 pm
And indeed many restrictions focus on particular places — sidewalks outside people’s homes (Frisby v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 1:42 pm
Tumey v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:23 am
I think we can all agree that, emotionally, you've got a pretty steep hill to climb -- regardless of the potential merits of your arguments -- in convincing the Ninth Circuit that you deserve relief.Let me also add that you don't do yourself any favors, Ted, by representing yourself. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 10:29 am
The American Tradition Institute, a conservative legal action group, has field suit to block the testing (ATI v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:01 am
Choate, 576 F2d 165, 174-177 (9th Cir. 1978) (government arranged for “mail cover,” under which postal service provided government agency with information appearing on the face of envelopes or packages addressed to defendant); People v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm?”. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:20 am
It turns out, though, that there’s one such defensive use incident I originally missed, but that yielded a Georgia Supreme Court decision just a few weeks ago, in Hill v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 7:10 am
Supp. 2d 233, 253 n.14 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) and as connoting a racial meaning, see Hill v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm
You can be liable for defaming an individual even if you do not name her.An interesting case is Leopold v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 4:25 am
Today the court hears oral argument in redistricting cases from Virginia and North Carolina, Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 9:48 am
John V. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 8:07 pm
(Ilya Somin) In a recent post on Kaur v. [read post]
