Search for: "People v. Rodriguez" Results 81 - 100 of 614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm by Donald Thompson
If tainted by suggestion, identification procedures can lead to irreparable misidentification (People v Rodriguez,79 NY2d at 449); “[t]he influence of improper suggestion upon identifying witnesses probably accounts for more miscarriages of justice than any other single factor; perhaps it is responsible for more such errors than all other factors combined”(People v Rodriguez, 79 NY2d at 449). [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:50 am by Ambrosio Rodriguez
The Miranda requirement to inform you of your rights comes from the decision in Miranda v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:56 am
Alberto Milian GROUP 58 (Marc Schumacher retiring)Oscar Rodriguez-Fonts v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:37 am by SHG
Following the discussion about the utility of the Supreme Court stating a rule as to whether, and for how long, a car stop can be extended beyond its lawful justification, all of which arose out of the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:50 am by Walter Olson
Deborah La Fetra at Pacific Legal on a case that arose against a shopping mall after a runaway car smashed through a floor-to-ceiling glass wall into a medical clinic: [On May 8,] the New Mexico Supreme Court decided in Rodriguez v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
  San Diego Police Sergeant Charles Lara drove into the Motel 6's parking lot and saw people pointing north. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 10:52 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  However, in 2016, the SCT in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:32 am by Steve Hall
The Washington Post has an interview with Bryan Stevenson, founder of the Equal Justice Initiative, who argued the juvenile cases decided in Miller v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:00 am
Do you have any idea how rude that was to the people involved? [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:18 am by SHG
Rodriguez kicked butt on the rights issue, but the remedy didn’t go nearly as well, due to Davis v. [read post]