Search for: "People in Interest of TM"
Results 81 - 100
of 509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2016, 6:51 am
Heavily criticized by TM offices, but it is beginning to ask the right questions about whether it makes sense to extend a mark to 500 million people and 23 languages when use is limited. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
Or more flexibility for new tech and interests as they arise? [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:49 pm
TM can both limit and validate TM rights. [read post]
20 May 2016, 12:25 pm
[Cue my head spinning around] McGeveran: invaded interest in SVA is totally diffuse and generalized, aggregate v. individual, as opposed to the person whose TM interest looks like it’s been invaded [though as McG would agree, I think, it’s the law that has decided that there’s been a harm rather than the TM owner having to show a harm]. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 7:07 am
The unconfused: also very interesting. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 2:09 am
What happens to those people who are selling 1 finger or 2 bar variations on a theme? [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 11:12 am
American Eagle—turns out people were buying the clothes because of the way the clothes looked, not because of the A&F TM. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
This is bad for people who don’t have much money: it means they are less able to assert valid claims and less able to defend against invalid claims. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm
Barton Beebe: There’s no interest at all in increasing use requirements/shrinking use to 3 years by major EU lawyers b/c they tend to represent the big brands. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
., where people have used the terms ‘pepperball,’ ‘pepper ball,’ and ‘pepper-ball’ amongst other things to refer to irritant filled projectiles. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 7:08 am
Understanding consumer interest as an interest in low prices makes it kind of hard to understand TM at all.You can reconcile all this with consumer interests: It's really all about identity politics. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
One thing people are realizing is that TM is messy. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
’s work about how it’s the surprise that causes people to hesitate—there’s no connection w/ a particular brand, so the response that we see when people confront supposedly diluting marks is not the brand-specific mechanism that we thought that it was.Many claims made in the reading were (perhaps unsurprisingly) persuasive to me, but striking how little empirical basis there is for so many of them: For example, The Constructive Role of Confusion in Trademark,… [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:42 pm
A balance designed to give weight to the interests of current trademark owners, but also to the interests of other potential registrants -- the innovators, speakers, entrepreneurs who want to register in a new gTLD as well. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:50 pm
Should TM be interested in branding at all? [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
Early acts just say the owner of a TM can register it; no attempt to define what a TM is, though people seem to think they understand that. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:01 pm
If the interest is really reputational, then it shouldn’t be pled as copyright or right of publicity, but only defamation/TM—those are the causes of action that incorporate audience interest. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
And now people need filters more than gatekeepers; build communities online in which people participate in the construction of truth, for good or ill. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Or it may have little/no further value on the market, in which case neither design nor © is of interest to investors. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:22 am
And yet: if people really would be confused, why would it matter that the claimed subject matter was abstract? [read post]
