Search for: "People v Diaz" Results 81 - 100 of 369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2012, 4:02 pm
On February 15, 1990 the case of the People of the State of New York, Respondent v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 8:30 am
  So what can possibly be at issue in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As the Court of Appeals has explained, where a police officer has probable cause to believe that the driver of an automobile has committed a traffic violation, a stop does not violate the state or federal constitutions and neither the primary motivation of the officer nor a determination of what a reasonable traffic officer would have done under the circumstances is relevant akin to People v Robinson and Whren v United States. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 8:39 am
For example the Court of Appeals in People v Rawlins and People v Meekins (10 N.Y.3d 136 [2/19/2008]), considered how Crawford applies two categories of evidence: DNA reports and , fingerprints, comparisons. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by Brian Shiffrin
The Court then determined that this error was harmless, since the defendant had confessed.Whether the holding of People v Brown (13 NY3d 332) was correct will likely be decided by the Supreme Court in Williams v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:44 am by Shea Denning
The State argued that in this way the rule was akin to the notice and demand statutes approved in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Over the weekend the New York Times ran a story by Adam Liptak previewing a US Supreme Court case ("Justices revisit rule requiring lab testimony," Dec. 19) called Briscoe v. [read post]