Search for: "People v. Cross"
Results 81 - 100
of 5,480
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2020, 1:45 pm
But notice that the caption is "People v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
This is the first in a series of posts on United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 3:48 pm
So the trial court booted the defendant, then let the trial go on with no one there for him -- including the direct examination of the victim -- and then let him back in only to cross-examine the main witness . . . having never heard her testimony on direct?! [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 12:01 pm
Erica Simpson crosses over a double yellow line on the south 405 into the HOV lane. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:40 am
Case Citation: Doe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 6:57 am
The case is called UFCW, Local 401 v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:44 pm
The Supreme Court in Michigan v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 5:38 pm
Michael Steinberg Colorado Criminal Defense Lawyer Introduction – Your Rights Under the Fourth Amendment While I have written on this subject before, a recent Colorado case, People v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:55 pm
The blog is located at: http://www.rluipa-defense.com/home.cfm In American Atheists v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 12:27 pm
Comparing cross-jurisdictional debates is sometimes enlightening. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:12 am
In People v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
(People v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:31 pm
” People v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
The Commitment Rule is a further development of the proposal we submitted to the Secretariat of UNCITRAL Working Group V (Insolvency) in an open letter on September 14, 2023. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 2:53 pm
The January 4, 2023, Court of Appeals opinion in SCDSS v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 2:34 pm
Christian and People v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:59 pm
") I hope that if you think that, you also agree — and many don't — with what Justice Scalia said at oral argument in Salazar v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:44 pm
(See People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:41 am
Case citation: QVC Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 1:28 pm
Although the People demonstrated due diligence in attempting to locate the victim for trial (see People v Arroyo, 54 NY2d 567, 571, cert denied 456 US 979), the court unduly restricted defense counsel's cross-examination of the victim at the preliminary hearing, and thus the admission in evidence of the preliminary hearing testimony deprived defendant of his right of confrontation (see People v Simmons, 36 NY2d 126, 130-131). [read post]
