Search for: "People v. Jackson (1996)" Results 81 - 100 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Jan. 7th, 2009)(Remand Order)Age discrimination challenge to a 1996 RIF grinds on; Paul Mollica nicely sums up this most recent decision here4th CircuitJones v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:38 am by Mayela Celis
In South Africa, Abortion is a right codified in law: The Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of 1996. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Despite their obvious intelligence, capacity for affection, when it comes to toxicology, dogs are not people, although some people act like the less reputable varieties of dogs. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
. “Identifiable” material would be treated differently from “non-identifiable” content, with the aspiration “that, over time, people will pay less attention to and take less notice of material which is anonymous”. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Jackson, No. 06-5205 Sentence for making false statements to police after defendant entered a plea agreement is affirmed over claims that the district court did not give sufficient consideration to whether she should be sentenced to probation, as defendant waived her right to appeal. . [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
FACTS Eva Cassidy was a popular singer and songwriter who died in 1996. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
FACTS Eva Cassidy was a popular singer and songwriter who died in 1996. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Mark MacCarthy
The clear intent in 1996 was to insulate online content distributors from being treated as the publisher of online content in the same way that the Supreme Court’s 1959 Smith v. [read post]