Search for: "People v. Kay"
Results 81 - 100
of 237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This largely came down to whether or not the current protesters prevented other people protesting in PSG. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Although Doherty had not been decided at the time that Kay & Price was, the ECtHR analysis of Kay (in Kay v UK) took the somewhat unusual step of referring to Doherty and finding that not only did the Gateways as outlined in Kay & Price not fulfil the requirements of Article 8, but neither did they as functionally expanded (albeit slightly) in Doherty. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 4:40 am
See, e.g., Buckley v. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 9:31 am
HKSAR v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:06 am
Kay, 577 F.3d 600, 609-11 (5th Cir. 2009).) [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 2:35 pm
Mary, like Deborah, reconceives the history from the 1970s-80s, but with a focus specifically on developments following Roe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
The Court of Appeal judgment in the case of Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire, (heard 3 April 2012 by Maurice Kay and Hooper LJJ and Henderson J) will be handed down on 19 July 2012. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 8:56 am
Kays, __ F. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
The ICO plans to write to more than 1,000 companies, which it believes are involved in buying and selling people’s names and numbers, as part of its ongoing crackdown on cold callers. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
Miller v Associated Newspapers, 10 and 11 December 2013 (Maurice Kay, Moore-Bick and Lloyd-Jones LJJ) Kneafsey v Independent Television, 11 December 2013 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:25 am
People v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
In this case, Mr Raw (incidentally a veteran of the Kay v Lambeth short-life housing battles and still in the same property despite an order for possession being made) had applied as homeless to Lambeth. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
In this case, Mr Raw (incidentally a veteran of the Kay v Lambeth short-life housing battles and still in the same property despite an order for possession being made) had applied as homeless to Lambeth. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
In Kopecky v Slovakia (2005) 41 EHRR 944 it was said that A1P1 "does not guarantee the right to acquire property". [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
ASIL has published an Insight (.pdf) about the recent ICJ decision in Belgium v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 9:28 am
Massey v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:19 pm
It’s a bad thing to do drugs, so don’t be bad by doing drugs, m’kay, that’d be bad. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 9:30 pm
The contents include notice of a memorial celebration for the life and career of Magistrate Judge Alan Kay and the opening of an oral history I conducted with him in 1997. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 2:53 am
Anne-Kristin Fricke, in her capacity as spokeswoman for the Munich I Regional Court on civil-law cases, confirmed that the court still plans to hand down decisions in, technically, ten Qualcomm v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 12:34 pm
(See People v Devinny, supra.) [read post]
