Search for: "People v. Logan"
Results 81 - 100
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
Merely pointing out that states don’t always follow one’s policy preferences is hardly a strong argument against federalism. (2) Professor Logan Sawyer of the University of Georgia Law School coincidentally has an excellent piece out on SSRN about the origins of Court’s holding in Hammer v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:48 pm
Supreme Court case that upheld sobriety checkpoints (Michigan v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 6:06 am
Netherlands Insurance Company v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:25 am
See People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 3:09 pm
The people are great (in the perimeter). [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:27 am
It’s the rationale behind the Neutrality and Logan Acts. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In another, Logan Alters, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm
Ms Houston had argued that her treatment was reminiscent of the Holocaust, when good people accepted an unacceptable regime. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 10:33 pm
Ginsburg United States V. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 6:05 am
In July, Trump met privately with Prime Minister Viktor Orban of Hungary, a potential violation of the Logan Act. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 8:00 am
People ex rel. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 6:27 pm
" Kisor v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Wallace v. [read post]
Chief Justice John Roberts and the “Privilege” of Seeing the World from Behind Fences and Barricades
25 May 2023, 9:01 pm
But, in a subtle dig, she reminded her audience that the Court’s rulings “matter in people’s lives and that shouldn’t be forgotten. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Supreme Court, January 22, 2008 Ali v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 5:58 am
Kansas v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Logan H. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
Trust and Estate Implications Involving Potentially Incapacitated PersonsS.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC (A-87-18) (081916) Argued November 6, 2019 -- Decided March 9, 2020ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.Only when, through proper legal procedures, a court determines that a litigant lacks the mental capacity to govern her affairs may the litigant be deprived of the right to decide the destiny of her lawsuit. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am
Logan, 650 So.2d 653, 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), a phrase that has been interpreted to mean a “determination or conclusion on the merits,” id. [read post]
2 Nov 2024, 2:30 am
Even under Counterman v. [read post]
