Search for: "People v. Mitchell"
Results 81 - 100
of 624
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2012, 7:45 am
Mitchell II: 76 percent to 24 percent Proves once again that people just don’t like paying taxes. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:05 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm
The same sex crimes was not charged in more than one of the counts (see People v Saunders, 290 AD2d 461 [2002]; People v Taylor, 190 Misc 2d 124 [2002]). [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:36 pm
No, the patent exhaustion doctrine, commonly referred to as the first sale doctrine, is triggered by an unconditional sale and was set way back in Mitchell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm
Mitchell; Civil Service Commission v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am
Mitchell has been clear that the Comstock Act could be transformed into the abortion ban that the antiabortion movement could never convince the American people to enact. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:49 am
See Smith v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:22 pm
People v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:00 am
Their lawsuit, Salim v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm
============================================Some interesting background here on the Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Salim v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 11:05 am
International Association of Firefighters, Local 42 v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 2:08 pm
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2019-2020update.html A petition for certiorari was filed in one case on 8/13/20, and denied on 8/25/20: Mitchell v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:51 am
A ruling from June 2019, Mitchell v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 10:55 am
People v Hall, 2007 NY Slip Op 1015, 2007 N.Y. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 1:13 pm
This is opinion is Mitchell v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:05 am
Supreme Court’s Decision in Jam v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 5:16 am
Burnet v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
The case is the most significant elections matter the justices have been forced to confront since the Bush v. [read post]
