Search for: "People v. Washington" Results 81 - 100 of 6,647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2007, 1:16 am
In reading one of Ted Frank's posts yesterday at Overlawyered, I was reminded that I have neglected to blog about a strange case from Washington, Woo v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
On Dec. 8, 2021, Reges criticized land acknowledgment statements in an email to faculty, and on Jan. 3, he included a modified version of UW's example statement in his syllabus: "I acknowledge that by the labor theory of property the Coast Salish people can claim historical ownership of almost none of the land currently occupied by the University of Washington. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 7:06 pm
Since counsel framed the claim exclusively in therms of the United States Constitution that Copurt applied the federal test for IAC set forth in Strickland v Washington (466 US 668); see People v McDonald, 1 NY3d 109, 114-115).On appeal Ms. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:17 am
Washington, it actually applied the less demanding standard of United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:17 pm by Steve Graham
  A jury for a felony poaching case in the State of Washington is composed of 12 people. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 10:54 am by Blair & Kim, PLLC
  Instead, they apply a balancing test based on several factors identified in King v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 11:14 am by Stacey Lantagne
In this instance, a case out of Washington called Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Seattle, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 9:40 am
Divided Supreme Court of the State of Washington affirms murder conviction of defendant tricked into providing DNA sample by police investigators who were impersonating lawyers: Today's ruling in State of Washington v. [read post]