Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 785
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2014, 9:22 am by Jennifer Jordan, JD, MSCC
Claimant Phillip Tucker was hurt on a vessel owned by the United States and being serviced at Cascade General, Inc., the plaintiff’s employer. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 7:31 am by Rokia Hassanein
The case may have a huge impact on the meaning of religious freedom in the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 9:01 pm
United States (06-1456), on whether the federal money laundering statute requires an attempt to create the appearance of legitimate wealth. [read post]
9 May 2018, 10:00 pm
However, the BRI standard for AIA trials is different from the standard used in federal district courts and the ITC, which construes patent claims in accordance with the principles that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit articulated in Phillips v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 7:30 pm by Jordan Bublick
  The 11th Circuit previously explained in the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 12:54 pm
While the current case dealt with homestead for descent and distribution purposes, and Walls dealt with the exemption against forced sale, since both provisions rely on the same constitutional definition of homestead, the court stated that the definitions cannot be different and thus finds its decision to be in conflict with Walls.PEGGY ANN PHILLIPS, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 1:56 pm
The FLSA requires all employers in the United States to pay workers engaged in commerce or the production of goods for commerce the prevailing minimum wage. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:41 am by Dwight Sullivan
The deadline for either a cert petition or request for additional time to file a cert petition in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:27 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Hagen, 44 U.S. 212, 230 (1845), holds that when a new state is admitted to the Union it gains “the same rights, sovereignty and jurisdiction in that behalf as the original states possess within their respective borders,” Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:26 am by Jon Hyman
When a judicial opinion starts out with a quote such as this, it’s usually not a good sign for the defendant, unless you happen to be the United Auto Workers, the defendant in Phillips v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
Facts The respondent, Gary Flood, was a Detective Sergeant with the Metropolitan Police Service’s Extradition Unit.   [read post]