Search for: "Phillips v. Hand" Results 81 - 100 of 620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2008, 7:35 am
Four years ago, the 6th Circuit handed down a landmark decision in Smith v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:39 pm by INFORRM
On 26 July 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat handed down a reserved judgment after the trial in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group ([2011] EWHC 1884 (QB)). [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:33 am by Daniel West
The appeal was heard by a five justice panel of Lady Hale and Lords Phillips, Kerr, Clarke and Reed. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
On 23 October, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the case of Woodland v Essex County Council. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
On 23 October, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the case of Woodland v Essex County Council. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:09 am by Dr. Stuart Baran
Lord [Sky]Walker and Lord Collins wrote the judgment of the court, with Lady Hale and Lord Phillips agreeing in full. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:35 am
Click here for a slightly more detailed summary to find out the answer.PD-1304-08, Phillip Jason Hall v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am by Anita Davies
In the case preview for R v Gnango , it was suggested that the question facing the Supreme Court read like a particularly complex examination problem. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
In ITV v TV CatchUp [2011] EWHC 2977 (Pat), which was handed down the day of the debate and which the IPKat reported here, Floyd J applied FAPL in the UK to say that the position on the temporary copies exception is acte clair as set out in FAPL, which would seem to contradict NLA v Meltwater. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:35 pm by Dennis Crouch
 Rather than looking to the “proper” claim construction as defined by Phillips v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 2:51 pm
  On the other hand, its actions toward other smokers are admissible to show how reprehensible the manufacturer's conduct was. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 5:50 am
Cole of Manatt Phelps Phillips sent word of a Manatt client's recent victory in CKE Restaurant v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 2:47 pm by SHG
The problem is that Graham v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:16 pm
  The employer-respondent will be represented by Carter Phillips of Sidley Austin, LLP. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 4:02 am by John Enser
It is not necessary, in addition, for the goods at issue to have been the subject, prior to the sale, of an offer for sale or advertising targeting consumers of that State.The Court relied on the earlier Phillips case which the IPKat looked at - not with an entirely happy face - here. [read post]