Search for: "Powell v. District of Columbia"
Results 81 - 94
of 94
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2009, 11:15 am
Frighteningly, the federal district court for the District of Columbia, where the Constitution currently resides, has declared legal documents unenforceable on grounds of sloppiness. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 8:19 am
Plaintiffs undoubtedly believe that Heller, which invalidated the District of Columbia's handgun ban, gives them a good chance at having the state bans struck down as well. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
Chicago (08-1521) — a case brought to it by Alan Gura, the Alexandria, VA., lawyer who won the 2008 decision for the first time recognizing a constitutional right to have a gun for personal use, at least in self-defense in the home (District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 12:53 pm
Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973)In re Persico. 522 F.2d 52, 54 (2d Cir. [1975])Powell v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:44 am
Barnes; opt 20 yr retirLast Act: 09/16/09 signed chap.425426
A3367A
Englebright (MS) -- Makes provisions for primary care givers to vote in general elections and school elections by absentee ballots BLURB : Elect. care givers absentee balloLast Act: 09/16/09 signed chap.426427
A3378
Rosenthal (MS) -- Allows social services districts to inform applicants and recipients of public assistance of their option to receive information regarding victims of sexual… [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 2:27 am
Columbia University Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:11 am
Furman v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 12:45 am
In Powell v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 9:50 am
Biden's first major test as Chairperson came in June 1987, when President Reagan nominated Robert Bork, then sitting on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, to replace the retiring Justice Lewis Powell. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:14 am
Rumsfeld, which he previously heard as a member of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 1:40 pm
I wonder whether the hypothesis holds true for the circuit and district courts as well? [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:03 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
