Search for: "Powers v. Jones et al" Results 81 - 100 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm by Lyle Denniston
Fox Television Stations, et al. (10-1293), but the protection from children from profanity and nudity considered harmful to them is directly at issue. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Reciting Articles 65(2) and 76 CTMR, it observed that the Court’s scrutiny is limited to the facts, evidence and arguments brought by the parties during the previous proceedings, and to the matters of law thereby examined (Case T-57/03, Société provençale d’achat et de gestion (SPAG) SAS v OHIM). [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Canada On 2 July 2024, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice issued its ruling involving the encampment at the University of Toronto, granting the University its requested order that can be used to remove the encampment, University of Toronto (Governing Council) v Doe et al. 2024 ONSC 3755. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:20 am by Joseph L. Hyde
LaFave et al., Search & Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 2.1(e) (6th ed. 2020). [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am by stevemehta
Filed 3/29/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JSM TUSCANY, LLC et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
As Chairman Schapiro explained the change, “in investigations that require subpoena power, time is always of the essence. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
In 1982, the Supreme Court again addressed and advanced solicitor-client privilege in Descôteaux et al. v. [read post]