Search for: "Price v. McDonald"
Results 81 - 100
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2020, 5:08 am
” Perkins v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am
A firm might want to deliver high-end advertisements to wealthy neighborhoods, or to deliver coupons when customers enter the mall, or offer a Burger King discount at a McDonald's, or promote farm-related software in rural areas.[5] In addition, online firms seek to segment markets geographically so that they can price discriminate based on differences in wealth or product demand by geography. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
A defendant in such an action may be entitled to an offset against the deficiency if the trial court determines that the fair market value of the property sold at foreclosure was greater than the foreclosure sales price. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
A defendant in such an action may be entitled to an offset against the deficiency if the trial court determines that the fair market value of the property sold at foreclosure was greater than the foreclosure sales price. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:30 pm
Witness the difficult issues in Hermes v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:20 am
Following patent exhaustion cases, Lexmark adopted “prebate”—advance discount on price, with a label with an alleged patent license/restriction saying that Lexmark could remanufacture it. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 3:06 pm
A pair of favored examples are Liebeck v McDonald’s Restaurants, aka “The Hot Coffee Case,” and Pearson v Chung, or “The Pants Lawsuit. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 1:05 pm
Price, 647 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 1994), Crosby v. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 12:18 pm
Price supports. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 11:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 1:44 pm
Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:39 pm
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 10:16 pm
McDonald's Corp. 1977 Ninth Circuit case. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:40 pm
McDonald. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Nicholson Price: Is there a theory justifying the use of multiple hypothesis testing? [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:35 am
Circle C set the prices for table and couch dances. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:17 pm
Lawrence v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
It's the tale of AJ Enterprises (Aust) Pty Ltd v McDonald's International Property Company Ltd [2009] NZIPOTM 12, in which the now green and lovely fast food company failed again to prevent the registration of Anisha's single arch device for, among other things, food, drink and restaurant services in Class 43. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
