Search for: "Rand v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2010, 6:50 pm by Anna Christensen
Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition for respondent Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Brief in opposition for the United States Brief for the United States Petitioners’ reply FEBRUARY SITTING: McDonald v. [read post]
Following the landmark ruling by the Supreme Court in Unwired Planet v Huawei, which stated that English courts can decide FRAND terms on a worldwide basis, English courts have become a popular forum for litigating SEP related disputes and it seems that they will likely continue to be so. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:18 am
Over a three-year period, the V&A Waterfront recorded a consumption saving of R15.5 million. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:20 am by Jordan Brunner
Ben reviewed the two big questions at issue in Washington v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:47 pm by David Lat
Recall his famous ruling in the movie-industry case of United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am by Cormac Early
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:05 am by Lori Lustrin
  First articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
In addition to Bill Marler, the top food safety attorney in the United States, court documents show Spoor’s team has enlisted these experts: Professor David Coetzee of the Division of Public Health Medicine at the School of Public Health and Family Medicine at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
You’ve likely heard:  in a bid to avert action by the United States, Russia has proposed that Syria abandon its chemical weapons stockpiles. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 12:24 pm by Sandy Levinson
  It is this dreadful feature of our political system, NOT required by the Constitution, that explains why it now counts as "success" if the United States doesn't go over a "cliff" or continues to pay its debts, as against genuinely confronting the serious problems that face us as a polity. [read post]