Search for: "STATE v. DAVIDSON"
Results 81 - 100
of 556
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Philip Davidson told the Senate Armed Service Committee on March 9 that the “greatest danger the United States and [its] allies face in the region is the erosion of conventional deterrence vis-à-vis the People’s Republic of China. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 9:14 am
Case citation: The Ohio State University v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
Bennett v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 10:55 am
This case, Campbell v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 3:34 pm
This blog post was co-written by EFF Legal Fellow Houston Davidson. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm
COVID-19 and Access to Medical Care in the United States May 26, 2020 | Allison K. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm
Nov. 6, 2020), Davidson v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 5:48 pm
Lastly, Smith applied Davidson v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:09 am
Under Davidson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 12:25 pm
Davidson & Christopher P. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s Sept. 2 decision on United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 4:25 am
Davidson & Christopher P. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 5:15 am
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the most recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:40 pm
In the latest development in the Trump v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 7:18 am
This ruling supplements the Ohio State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 3:53 pm
So even though federal court might generally be preferable in a lot of cases, you'd want to think deeply about it in any particular case, especially a class action.Here, you've got a defendant (Harley-Davidson) who removed the case under CAFA, saw the federal judge remand the case back to state court, and then filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit to keep it in federal court. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 am
” Slip op. at 12-13 (emphasis in original) (distinguishing State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
