Search for: "STATE V. CLARENCE SCOTT"
Results 81 - 100
of 186
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2018, 3:49 pm
Supreme Court ordered the state supreme court to reconsider that ruling in light of the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Foster v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 2:27 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:55 am
Township of Scott and New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
Township of Scott, an important Takings Clause property rights case. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm
Ginni Thomas, the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas, has taken her seat in the guest box. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 7:17 am
Township of Scott, the Supreme Court will consider whether to overrule Williamson County. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:32 am
And in 1990 David Souter refused to state his position on Roe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am
” At Medium, Nick Lum points out that the South Dakota attorney general, who represented the state in South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am
Hodges, Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
” Commentary comes from Scott Lemieux at Lawyers, Guns & Money. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:19 pm
United States. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
Justice Samuel Alito is up next with Husted v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:29 am
In the majority decision in Husted v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 9:12 am
Monday’s opinion in Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 4:07 am
United States and Collins v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 4:20 am
” Additional coverage comes from Scott Bomboy at Constitution Daily, Jordan Rubin at Bloomberg BNA, and Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, who reports that “[i]n concurrence, Justice Clarence Thomas agreed with the main holding but was a lone voice announcing scepticism about the long-standing ‘exclusionary rule’ that suppresses illegally grabbed evidence. [read post]
29 May 2018, 7:46 am
In Collins v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 3:04 am
” Two views of the recent case Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:51 am
In McCoy v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 1:32 pm
For instance, they describe a a short but telling November 2017 exchange between Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Stephen Breyer, and Scott Gant (counsel for the Department of the Interior) in the case of Patchak v. [read post]
