Search for: "Sides v. Contemporary Homes"
Results 81 - 100
of 133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2016, 7:54 am
Especially strong are Rosa’s observations as to how and why contemporary civil-military relations are marred by mistrust and misunderstandings at the senior levels of government, and how this plays out on a day-to-day basis. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:30 am
It opens with the efforts of a Lagos embassy officer setting off to assess tourism prospects for seekers of Picathartes oreas, the gray-necked rockfowl that is one of Africa’s most prized birds, in the company of a Discovery Channel producer, the owners of a birding tour company, a naturalist, and BBC correspondent … the officer described a trek over barely passable clay track and rickety bridges … [reaching Okomu National Park access road] even the BBC’s 4x4… [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
The ABA has served the legal profession in this area, publishing books such as Social Media for Lawyers: The Next Frontier,[15] Blogging for Lawyers [16] (as well as Twitter for Lawyers,[17] Facebook for Lawyers,[18] and LinkedIn for Lawyers [19]) and The Legal Side of Blogging for Lawyers.[20] The writing advice in these sources tends to be encouraging and fairly general, giving sound advice but also emphasizing that blogging has low barriers to entry and “no hard-and-fast rules. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:33 pm
In the recent case (Ali v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:28 am
This also points up, by the way, that the amendment difficulty argument itself is a product of contemporary times and likely did not exist prior to the late nineteenth century.As a side matter, I don’t agree that constitutional change through judicial review is best conceptualized as “informal” if Supreme Court rulings can themselves be overcome only through formal amendment. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:46 am
Because it represents the dark side of the judicial system and the elusiveness of obtaining justice; Jarndyce v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 8:54 am
Supreme Court decided Gregg v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 1:28 pm
I agree with Greenfield that there are plausible constitutional arguments to be made on either side. [read post]
22 May 2015, 2:02 pm
Right's side of the steep hillside.Initially, Ms. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:19 am
Congress has previously responded to concerns regarding private copying in the context of library photocopying (through Section 108 of the Copyright Act) and home audiotapes (through the Audio Home Recording Act). [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 11:46 am
Important steps forward – Brown v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
In my opinion, the result is a rich scholarly exchange on issues of major contemporary importance. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
But a side-by-side comparison of the judges and their opinions shows Feldman to be overwhelmingly outgunned by Posner. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
The basics of that process at the heart of the common law system, in contemporary language, include notice, an opportunity to be heard, consistency, predictability and appeal to ensure accountability. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 11:59 am
The home is a foundationally protected place, he rightly explains. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
If civil rights lawyers begin invoking the principles elaborated and consolidated by popular spokesmen like Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey and Richard Nixon and Everett Dirksen, and not only depend on the opinions of the Warren and Burger Courts, these justices may begin to embrace an originalist framework that provides this great legacy with a solid foundation in popular sovereignty.Supreme Court litigators have one overriding objective: getting five votes on their side. [read post]
