Search for: "Slade v. Slade" Results 81 - 100 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
Firstly, the IPCC and the Metropolitan Police v The Guardian (clause 1). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
How else can one explain why Slade Gorton as AG of the State of Washington argued Oliphant when there were zero states’ rights at play in that case? [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by INFORRM
(a)   Mrs Justice Slade, Mr Justice Lindblom and Mrs Justice Nicola Davies (b)  Hacked Off, Children In Need, Reprieve (c)  Times Newspapers Limited, Andrew Gilligan, Viagogo Limited (d)   £65,000, £90,000, £125,000 (e)   Mr Justice Eady, HHJ Radford and The Recorder of Belfast (f)   Citation PLC v Ellis Whittam Limited, Waterson v Lloyd & Anor , Rothschild v Associated Newspapers 3. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:10 am by Dylan Gibbs
— Tom Slade (@thomasslade) May 30, 2024 👨‍⚖️ TMU letter could have used revisions, but students didn’t breach the school’s Code of Conduct. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Ferdinand v MGN, heard 4 to 6 July 2011 (Nicol J) WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers, 18-20 & 22 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) Share this:PrintEmailTwitterFacebookLike this:Be the first to like this post. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
An attempt by Ms F to argue that the rule in Rylands v Fletcher (1866) L.R. 1 Exch. 265 applied giving rise to a strict liability on CHA was quickly dealt withThe use in question must therefore be extraordinary and unusual in contrast to, [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
An attempt by Ms F to argue that the rule in Rylands v Fletcher (1866) L.R. 1 Exch. 265 applied giving rise to a strict liability on CHA was quickly dealt withThe use in question must therefore be extraordinary and unusual in contrast to, [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
Last week’s resolved cases include: Mr John Donovan v Metro, Clause 1, 21/05/2012; Lesley Archer v The Echo (Southend), Clause 1, 18/05/2012; Ms Nicola Searle v South Wales Echo, Clauses 1, 3, 17/05/2012; Mr Liam Fairlie v North Devon Journal, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Northampton Chronicle & Echo, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v The Sun, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Daily Mirror, Clause 1,… [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
(Mrs Laura McQueen v Daily Record, Clause 5, 24/05/2012). [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am by INFORRM
The trial in the case of El-Naschie v Macmillan finally began on 11 November 2011. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Football manager Russell Slade is bringing a claim on behalf of 850 professional footballers to retake control of the huge amounts of data about them that is traded and relied upon by betting firms, data collection agencies, and entertainment companies. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On 21 December 2011, Eady J gave judgment in the “harassment” case of Neocleous v Jones ([2011] EWHC 3459 (QB)) Two judgments were also given in relation to “phone hacking indemnity” claims, Coulson v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3482 (QB)) and Mulcaire v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3469 (Ch)). [read post]