Search for: "Smith v. Smith" Results 81 - 100 of 14,628
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Contrary to petitioner's contention, we do not find his case to be one of "the rarest of cases" in which an exception to the general rule applies (Matter of Taranto v City of Glen Cove, 212 AD3d at 828 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1211). [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
  After the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
20 Apr 2025, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Equality & Human Rights Commission: Statement on Supreme Court ruling in For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 5:50 am by John Mikhail
DOJ might have relied on Schuck and Smith when appealing to “consent” in this fashion, but in any case, its quotation from Elk v. [read post]
16 Apr 2025, 5:00 am
In its non-precedential decision in the case of Banasiak v. [read post]
16 Apr 2025, 2:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In particular, Plaintiff avers that Kalyuzhny acted as an attorney for SCAS before Hall Booth Smith, P.C. was retained by the insurance carrier. [read post]
13 Apr 2025, 11:56 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Redfern & Hunter, the popular commentary on international commercial arbitration, quote Paul Smith Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 2:56 am by Oliver Fairhurst
[Alessandro’s Katpost on Lidl v Tesco here] The relevance of comparative advertising law has increased. [read post]