Search for: "Smith v. Stevens" Results 81 - 100 of 856
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Donald Kerwin, The Trials and Consolations of Migrant Serving Faith Communities, (April 12, 2023).Steven Douglas Smith, Christians and/as Liberals? [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Galloway, (Northwestern University Law Review Online Vol. 108, p. 218, 2014).Steven Douglas Smith, Is God Irrelevant? [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm by Steven Calabresi
[Defendant standing must exist at all stages of any litigation and must be raised by the justices of the Supreme Court even if the litigants themselves fail to raise it] On Thursday, April 25th the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:37 am by Adam Klasfeld
” However, Cannon appeared troubled by the “limitless” nature of the appropriations, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Avishalom Westreich, Assisted Reproduction in Israel: Law, Religion, and Culture, (Brill Research Perspectives: Family law in a Global Society, 2018).Steven Douglas Smith, The Case of the Exemption Claimants: Religion, Conscience, and Identity, (San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 18-345, 2018).Sidney Martin, Oklahoma's 'Bone-Dry' Law and the Fallacy of Legislative Accommodation Under Employment Division v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 12:20 pm by Meg Martin
RoemmichCitation: 2010 WY 115Docket Number: S-10-0008Appeal from the District Court of Park County, the Honorable Steven R. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 5:46 pm by Steven Calabresi
After an incredibly busy week, I finally had time today to read carefully Judge Aileen Cannon's opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 3:18 am by Amy Howe
’” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie outlines what he describes as “a plausible scenario” in which the Chief Justice “may vote in the liberal direction in both King v Burwell,the Obamacare case, and Obergefell v Hodges, the same-sex marriage case. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:10 am
For publication opinions today (3): Smith & Wesson Corp., et al & United States of America v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:22 am
Stanford student John Dalton discusses last week’s oral argument in No. 08-5274, Dean v. [read post]