Search for: "South Carolina v. Johnson"
Results 81 - 100
of 250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 9:47 am
However, the Supreme Court in Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
LEXIS 77587 (D SC, Oct. 2, 2008), a South Carolina federal district court, adopting a magistrate's recommendations, rejected complaints that Muslim inmates were allowed to pray only in common areas, and not in closed areas of the prison such as the barber shop.In Shaw v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Ogden to Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Johnson & Johnson Corp. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
South Carolina v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
South Carolina v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:19 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:15 am
Seay was indicted for murder in South Carolina along with two co-defendants. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 10:38 am
Earlier this month, South Carolina adopted a law that requires people sentenced to death to choose between the electric chair and the firing squad. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am
Returning Relists Johnson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Johnson suggested that nuclear war might result if Barry Goldwater was elected president. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 11:24 am
Supreme Court in Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 11:24 am
Supreme Court in Shelby County v. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 4:11 pm
By Caelan Brady (Kovacich Snipes Johnson) & Matthew Murphy (Murphy Law Firm) Many of us have received a call from an undocumented worker who was injured at work. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
Yet while Clementa Pinckney’s death may provide the impetus for South Carolina to remove the Confederate Battle Flag from the Statehouse grounds, I doubt it will lead South Carolina to address gun violence, the racial imbalance in the criminal justice system, or the substandard schools that our own Supreme Court has found constitutionally deficient. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
South Carolina, which recognized a capital defendant’s broad due process right to rebut any “implication” or “inference” of dangerousness “from the [government’s] evidence,” and misread the record, which plainly shows that the petitioner’s expert testimony would have rebutted not only the government’s evidence but also its summation arguments; and (2) whether, after the Supreme Court invalidated the definition of a… [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:00 am
There is nothing in the Federal Arbitration Act that precludes either of these determinations by the Supreme Court of South Carolina”) (citations omitted); see also id. at 452-53 (Breyer, J.) [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Johnson, however, found that South Carolina’s law violated the Commerce Clause of the Constitution insofar as the state’s law imposed significant costs on the interstate and international shipping prevalent in Charleston. [read post]
