Search for: "State v. Bias" Results 81 - 100 of 5,286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  The Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Voting RightsThe Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Thom Brooks (Durham University - Law School; Yale Law School) has posted The Relevance of State Misconduct for Mitigating Individual Punishment (In Julian V. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
His bias made him a careless historian. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:05 pm by admin
As he noted in a 2004 lecture at the Center for Science in the Public Interest: “my bias is ideological. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am by Guest Author
In terms of potential bias, some respondents expressed sympathy for the rule, others antipathy. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
First, paraquat is closely regulated for agricultural use in the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Justice Michael Lee stated in his judgment that they were uncontradicted by any evidence in reply from Lehrmann. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm by Benson Varghese
Demonstrable bias or prejudice against one of the parties involved in the trial. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm by Benson Varghese
Demonstrable bias or prejudice against one of the parties involved in the trial. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm by Benson Varghese
Demonstrable bias or prejudice against one of the parties involved in the trial. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) states that “An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled . . . is inadmissible”, and the BIA held in Matter of V-X-, 26 I&N Dec. 147 (BIA 2013) , that a grant of asylum is not an “admission” for these purposes, leaving asylees subject to the grounds of inadmissibility (although with the proviso that they cannot be removed unless their asylum status is terminated). [read post]