Search for: "State v. Country"
Results 81 - 100
of 24,226
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2025, 5:51 am
An excerpt from Friday's long decision in State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 5:05 am
State, 366 N.C. 323 (2012) (decided the same day as Hest Technologies and on the same basis) Sandhill Amusements, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 3:28 pm
From Farrakhan v. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 2:59 pm
As a country (assuming your country is the United States)? [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 6:38 am
The letter further stated that “[s]uch conduct is particularly egregious given [her] stature and position . . . as the Executive Director of Financial Management. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 6:59 am
First Legal Found. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 4:00 am
If you don’t believe me, please read this long quote from a 1984 Supreme Court decision, Bob Jones v. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
Anderson (ruling that states could not determine eligibility for federal office), City of Grants Pass v. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 2:24 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 1:57 pm
Garland and Firebaugh v. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 7:34 am
In October 2024, Costa Rica was the first Central American country to launch an AI strategy. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 7:02 am
The Supreme Court has set this case, Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 11:52 am
The Iranian attack marked the latest escalation in fighting that now stretches into several countries in the region, with warnings that more fighting is likely. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 6:00 am
In Al-Hamim v. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm
In Cadwalladr, the Court of Appeal also confirmed that “publication” for the purposes of section 1(1) (and indeed, the 2013 Act as a whole unless otherwise stated) continued to have its common law meaning – a communication of the statement to someone other than the claimant – and that each single communication is a separate and actionable tort. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 2:18 am
The measure has been largely supported on the grounds that it addresses the country’s “growing popularity as a venue for criminals to launder illicit funds,” with LLCs (limited liability companies) and corporations used for such operations, and which under state laws might not be obligated to disclose their involvement. [read post]
28 Dec 2024, 8:44 am
The respondent in PepsiCo India Holdings Pvt Ltd v. [read post]
27 Dec 2024, 6:35 am
This is one of the mootness cases.The case is John Does v. [read post]
27 Dec 2024, 4:00 am
This factor leads us to the very lengthy footnote 48 in Dobbs v. [read post]
