Search for: "State v. Leisure"
Results 81 - 100
of 419
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2009, 6:58 pm
As some may know the judge, pursuant to Allen v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:06 am
Cases seem to move at a leisurely pace in the Virgin Islands, in both federal and state courts. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] The New Blacklist: "Metropolitan Opera Says It Will Cut Ties with Pro-Putin Artists"
3 Mar 2022, 10:10 am
Compare Cavanaugh v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm
They held that such a prohibition cannot be justified either in light of the objective of protecting intellectual property rights or by the objective of encouraging the public to attend football stadiums.Judgment in Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08Football Association Premier League and Others v QC Leisure and Others Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm
This week, my colleague, Jeanne Fromer, and myself had the pleasure of hosting a Tri-State conference on Intellectual Property at Fordham Law School. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
In 2013, in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:00 am
The court’s decision dramatically expands the number of investor suits against pharmaceutical companies that state a claim and substantially increases the pressure on companies to settle meritless claims. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
The law has been recently considered by the Supreme Court in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Limited [2015] UKSC 10; [2015] AC 1229, which I sought to summarise in Vertical Leisure Limited v Poleplus Limited [2015] EWHC 841 (IPEC). [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 4:47 pm
She drew attention to the fact that, in the leading case of Delfi AS v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 2:14 pm
But he'd probably have been perfectly happy with a dispute over the ownership of a wall, as in The Creative Foundation v Dreamland Leisure Ltd & Ors [2015] EWHC 2556 (Ch) (11 September 2015).Separating intellectual property from the concrete items in or on which it is carried or displayed is a big conceptual problem for anyone coming fresh to the topic. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
”http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/14278737.Glasgow_pub__quot_first_in_Scotland_quot__to_receive_penalty_for_Premier_League_copyright_breach/Joined cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v QC Leisure and Others and C-429/08 Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd More on the Karen Murphy case here. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm
Parkwood Leisure Limited v Alemo-Herron and others, heard 13 – 14 April 2011. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 1:21 pm
Toro v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:34 pm
Case is Fischer v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 9:57 am
The Skocir v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:54 am
" See Vertical Leisure Ltd v Poleplus Ltd [2015] EWHC 841 (IPEC) at 66.As the Master identified, one of the difficulties that claimant(s) in IP claims commonly face is that they have no direct knowledge of the circumstances in which the infringing acts occurred and the individuals directly involved in them. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:06 am
In reaching this view, this Kat does not rely on the reasoning of the CJEU decision in Case C-403/08 FAPL v QC Leisure [2011]. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am
Parkwood Leisure Limited v Alemo-Herron and others, heard 13 – 14 April 2011. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 4:20 am
The reasoning for this was stated to be that, as the budget decision had been made and carried out, and as it would be extremely difficult to reverse – in particular as it would have a retrospective effect on council tax – no relief could be granted and thus the appeal must be dismissed. [read post]
