Search for: "State v. Ochoa"
Results 81 - 100
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2016, 7:27 am
Unconvinced, the court stated that nothing in ostensible agency “marks it as forbidden territory under Rule 23. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 7:40 am
In Ochoa-Cronfel v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 4:19 pm
Gustafson of the Small Business Administration (SBA), Inspector General Carol Fortine Ochoa of the U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:56 pm
On October 27, 2015, the Ninth Circuit reversed and sustained the EEOC’s broad subpoena in EEOC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 3:45 pm
”United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 12:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
” Marya v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:06 am
But the employees’ negligence claims were barred as an obvious (and prohibited) attempt to use common law claims to seek punitive damages or other relief not provided for in the California labor and employment statutes (Ochoa v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:41 am
” Healy v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
School of Law) Tyler Ochoa (Santa Clara Univ. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:06 am
In Brown v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:53 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:33 am
(CCNV v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
To prepare those trivia questions, my colleagues (Tyler Ochoa and Brian Love) and I made a list of potential questions and then picked our favorites. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
The reasoning has been criticized by commentators (including, quite powerfully, by Tyler Ochoa, here). [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 10:14 am
Affirmed.Case Name: JESUS ANTONIO GONZALEZ-OCHOA v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:45 am
Ochoa notes that “[t]he Keller court thus (somewhat strangely) abdicated its role as a federal court to construe federal law, and instead deferred to a state court’s view of federal law. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa [Eric's note: this is a long blog post from my colleague Tyler. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm
On reflection: Dietemann v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
This is especially helpful because the legal and colloquial definitions of monopoly differ throughout history — the term means something different under the current Sherman Antitrust Act, to someone during the era of trust-busting in early 20th century United States, and to a jurist in 18th century England. [read post]
