Search for: "State v. Royal"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,953
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
25 May 2024, 11:12 pm
The full list of Bills granted Royal Assent on 24 May 2024 is here. [read post]
22 May 2024, 7:00 am
v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm
Her death sparked outcry from human rights advocates, who urged the government to reform the lèse-majesté (royal insult) law and to stop persecuting State critics. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:16 pm
Carlisle v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
X Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:00 am
Facts – This case (Martin-Viana v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 3:01 pm
See United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
Ormondroyd Ch was unconvinced by the justification, stating: “[20]. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:58 am
In Bufkin v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:08 am
(relisted after the Apr. 19 conference) Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 8:24 am
Royal Ins. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 8:44 am
Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 6:02 am
In Huerta v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am
United States, 293 F. 1013, 1014 (D.C. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
This decision followed the Second Circuit’s earlier decision in Hamilton International Ltd v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am
Zoe Ingenhaag, Lexology: Gender critical beliefs in the workplace: on Phoenix v The Open University, Meade v Westminster City Council and Anor and Ali v Reason & Nott. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
