Search for: "State v. Slater"
Results 81 - 100
of 201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2017, 5:06 pm
After pondering the challenges posed by the legalization of marijuana, a Rhode Island superior court held that Darlington Fabrics violated the state’s Hawkins-Slater Act by refusing to hire an intern because she held a medical marijuana card. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm
United States Blog Law Online has a post dealing with the question “Is journalism harassment? [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm
United States A California patient privacy case has reached the state´s Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 8:19 am
United States, 127 Fed. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 1:06 am
The US District Court did look at non-human authorship some time ago in Naruto v Slater (discussed more here and here), and maintained that non-humans cannot have authorship in works, which has been established some time in the US judiciary (specifically referring to 'humans' or 'persons'). [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
US District Judge William Orrick ruled that the monkey, who borrowed British photographer David Slater's camera and took the selfies, cannot own the copyright in the pictures. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:22 pm
Slater-Chandler) and Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia’s Beyond Deportation: The Role of Prosecutorial Discretion in Immigration Cases (review by R. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 8:37 am
During his stint at the Department of Justice, Sanford also participated in the only criminal trial ever held by the Supreme Court: United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
In contrast, the same papers described Omar Mateen, the man responsible for the Pulse nightclub massacre in Orlando, as “an Islamic extremist … pledged to Islamic State”. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 5:35 am
State v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
8 May 2016, 8:59 pm
See Order, Naruto, et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 8:59 pm
See Order, Naruto, et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 4:04 am
Occasionally there are cases that seem to be tailor-made for legal geeks: Naruto v Slater; Lucasfilm v Ainsworth; DC Comics v Towle. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 7:50 am
Slater: “Naruto is not an “author” within the meaning of the Copyright Act. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:38 am
The case is that of Naruto v Slater, where PETA sued British photographer David Slater for copyright infringement, claiming to be acting on behalf of Naruto the monkey. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:08 am
The full text of his judgment has not been released, however, he did state during the hearing for the opinion that "... [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 7:15 am
Slater decided that his future lay in emigrating to the United States, he faced such draconian trade-secrets laws in his native Britain (which tried to enforce them in a failed attempt to prevent new technology from arriving to the United States) that he had to keep his travel plans secret from family and friends, and disguise himself as a farm labourer. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
