Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 12,634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
But since it has no home State in the United States, that means that in that situation, there’s no place for plaintiffs to come together and sue that person, correct? [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:18 am
The California Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Monday that the state legislature does have the power to use advisory ballot measures. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The landscape changed dramatically, however, in 2013, with the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 6:41 pm
Apte v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 5:22 pm
Analysis of United States municipal plans, Vol 17, No 6 Environmental Research Letters,2022. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 2:03 pm
First, Howlett v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 1:00 pm
On September 29, 2016, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the matter of Expressions Hair Design et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 11:37 am
District Court for the Eastern District of California issued its ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:01 am
State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:32 am
Friend, the United States Supreme Court addressed the confusion among state courts regarding the appropriate standard to establish a corporate or company defendant's place of business in a diversity case. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 2:15 pm
In August, the United States Attorney’s Office (USAO) for the Northern District of California charged a pioneer of self-driving car technology, Anthony Levandowski, with 33 counts of theft and attempted theft of trade secrets from Google under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:43 am
United States of America (C.D.Cal. filed Mar. 9, 2009) on the motion of the California Attorney General, and has done so on narrow, procedural grounds, without reaching the merits of the due process and equal-protection claims:As Plaintiffs' marriage is valid within California, they cannot present an injury with respect to the recognition of their marriage by the State of California under Lujan [v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:52 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:27 pm
In California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:25 pm
The court then turns to United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
And those 26 states have now been joined by the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:20 am
Listen to this extended NPR discussion of United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
In State v. [read post]
