Search for: "State v Rangel"
Results 81 - 100
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2009, 12:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:26 am
This number is likely misleading, however, because E. coli O157:H7 infections did not become a reportable disease in any state until 1987 when Washington became the first state to mandate its reporting. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:01 am
Ask the taxgirl: Foreign Homes Ask the taxgirl: Reporting Misc Income Under $600 Ask the taxgirl: Income v Inheritance Tax [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 4:06 pm
Graham, and V. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 6:26 pm
Graham, and V. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 8:40 am
" So what's the legitimate governmental interest in imposing a tax of 90%, a rate selected because one congressman (I think it was Charlie Rangel) noted that state and local taxes would take care of the other 10%? [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 12:47 pm
" Collins v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 8:12 pm
” Calder v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 9:49 am
Larry Craig v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
The amendment introduced by Ranking Member Rangel during the informal markup on June 15, 2005, set forth these changes. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 11:54 pm
In a study of E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks from 1982-2002, the authors estimated that half of the produce-associated outbreaks were due to produce already contaminated with E. coli O157 before purchase by the retail store or consumer (Rangel et al, 2005). [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 9:43 pm
Rangel v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 6:08 pm
Escherichia coli O157:H7 Infections in Children Associated with Raw Milk and Raw Colostrum From Cows --- California, 2006 CDC this morning published the following findings in MMWR: Five of six patients reported they had consumed brand A raw dairy products in the week before their illness onset; the sixth patient denied drinking brand A raw milk, although his family routinely purchased it. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 4:27 am
(quoting United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:38 am
" United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:53 am
02/08/2008
Appellate Ruling in State of New Jersey v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 11:46 pm
Olivares-Rangel, 458 F.3d 1104, 1106 (10th Cir.2006) (interpreting Lopez-Mendoza as merely reiterating long-standing jurisdictional rule), and United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Supreme Court case Atkins v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
In Campbell v. [read post]
