Search for: "State v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 81 - 100
of 927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2012, 10:42 am
In Steffey v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 1:10 pm
There is usually 'no better evidence of the state of one’s health” than the medical opinions from the patient’s current treating doctor.' (Gunn v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:48 pm
North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm
The agency currently at issue is the North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners, which is authorized by state statute to regulate the dental profession in North Carolina. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
We note that the Board was entitled to reject claimant's medical evidence even though there was no other medical evidence presented on the issue of causation (see Matter of Glowczynski v Suburban Restoration Co., Inc., 174 AD3d 1236, 1238 [3d Dept 2019]; Matter of Bradley v US Airways, Inc., 58 AD3d 1043, 1045 [3d Dept 2009]). [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
We note that the Board was entitled to reject claimant's medical evidence even though there was no other medical evidence presented on the issue of causation (see Matter of Glowczynski v Suburban Restoration Co., Inc., 174 AD3d 1236, 1238 [3d Dept 2019]; Matter of Bradley v US Airways, Inc., 58 AD3d 1043, 1045 [3d Dept 2009]). [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 9:03 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred in holding that the Department of Veterans Affairs enjoys a presumption that its medical examiner is competent in every veterans-benefit case; and (2) whether the Federal Circuit erred in expanding the presumption of competency so that the VA and reviewing courts presume, not only that VA medical examiners are competent, but also that they are specialists in the relevant area of medicine. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 11:30 am
In order to stay in compliance with federal Antitrust laws (see NC State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 11:30 am
In order to stay in compliance with federal Antitrust laws (see NC State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 5:04 am
LEXIS 7626 April 10, 2008, Decided “Ordon retained Karpie to represent him in proceedings before the Connecticut Medical Examining Board ("CMEB") after a patient reported to the Connecticut Department of Public Health ("CDPH") an adverse result in a surgery performed by plaintiff. [read post]
1 May 2023, 2:39 pm
National Board of Medical Examiners, a summary order issued on May 1. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:35 am
The court granted the City's motion, noting that the Medical Board is an agency within the meaning of 2 NYCRR 353, which provides for medical examinations, the creation of a medical board and the right to a hearing to challenge any adverse findings adopted by the Board. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
Colburn v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
McBride v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm
The agency currently at issue is the North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners, which is authorized by state statute to regulate the dental profession in North Carolina. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:53 am
Board of Education of Springfield School District No. 186 v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:17 pm
The Comptroller "possesses the authority to resolve conflicting medical evidence and to credit the opinion of one expert over that of another, so long as the credited expert articulates a rational and fact-based opinion premised upon a physical examination and consideration of the relevant medical records" (Matter of Clorofilla v Hevesi, 38 AD3d 1126, 1126 [2007]; see Matter of Freund v Hevesi, 34 AD3d 950, 951 [2006]). [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 3:22 pm
The Comptroller "possesses the authority to resolve conflicting medical evidence and to credit the opinion of one expert over that of another, so long as the credited expert articulates a rational and fact-based opinion premised upon a physical examination and consideration of the relevant medical records" (Matter of Clorofilla v Hevesi, 38 AD3d 1126, 1126 [2007]; see Matter of Freund v Hevesi, 34 AD3d 950, 951 [2006]). [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 3:00 pm
Board of Trade (06-1265), asking whether commodities’ merchants may sue a board of trade for failing to enforce its rules, and in Ali v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
"In contrast the System's board-certified orthopedic surgeon conducted an independent medical examination of Trooper and after a physical examination of Trooper, a review of his medical records and consideration of Trooper's "subjective complaints" opined that Trooper is not permanently disabled or incapable of performing the duties of a state trooper.In response to Trooper's contention that the hearsay evidence… [read post]
