Search for: "State v. Finn"
Results 81 - 100
of 109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2022, 10:00 pm
The Finns whipped the Red Army. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:29 am
Blake State Representative Dist. 20, Pos. 1 – Corinne Tobeck State Representative Dist. 20, Pos. 2 – Uncontested State Representative Dist. 21, Pos. 1 – Mary Helen Roberts State Representative Dist. 21, Pos. 2 – Marko Liias State Representative Dist. 22, Pos. 1 – Steve Robinson State Representative Dist. 22, Pos. 2 – Sam Hunt / Chris Reykdal State Representative Dist. 23, Pos. 1 – Sherry… [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 7:26 pm
NSSTA announced: New NSSTA voting bylaws; Election of new Directors Betty Gregware and Daniel Finn; plus A new NSSTA Channel on YouTube. [read post]
25 May 2012, 3:08 pm
State, ex rel., Wyo. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am
(IP finance) Europe Cognac comes of best in spirited attack on Finns: Joined cases C-4/10 and C-27/10 Bureau national interprofessionel du Cognac v Gust. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer) US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer) US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:52 pm
[v] Peter Finn, Citizen Review of Police: Approaches and Implementation, U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 5:46 am
In the 2006 case Garcetti v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
At the same time, the state's responsibility of deference appears to be deficient. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:18 pm
A federal judge ordered his release in March 2010, but the United States government has fought that order. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
The U.S. case is Feist Publications v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 1:33 pm
The researchers studied the DNA of 800 Finnish criminals and compared it with 2,000 non-incarcerated Finns who had given DNA samples for a previous study. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:56 pm
The reader might miss Siems’s subtle acknowledgement later on (which he does not quite state directly) that Robertson’s opinion was vacated by the D.C. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Case law The Spencer v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:50 am
Tenet, who oversaw the brutal interrogations, and Michael V. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 4:47 pm
His Honour stated: “At first glance, it therefore appears [under s106B(2) and s80(1)] that the Court could very well have the power to make the order charging the husband’s mother’s property if the Court is satisfied after a trial of the orders sought pursuant to s106B should be made and that the husband’s mother should be ordered to repay the money directly to the wife rather than the husband,… [read post]
