Search for: "State v. J. Mitchell" Results 81 - 100 of 467
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Lawrence Sanders, State University of New York at Buffalo. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“When a plaintiff brings a cause of action based upon fraud, ‘the circumstances constituting the wrong shall be stated in detail'” (Sargiss v Magarelli, 12 NY3d 527, 530, quoting CPLR 3016[b]). [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 8:43 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Crown attempted to rely on Justice Binnie’s holding in Mitchell v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
One New Jersey appellate court upheld the disqualification of an expert witness who had worked for the State of New Jersey on a case that involved confidential disclosures by the State’s lawyers and its agencies, which disclosures were necessarily involved in the expert witness’s subsequent retention by the State’s adversary in a different case.[10] This decision, like most in this area, turned on a close analysis of the facts and circumstances of the… [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 6:08 am
Trusting What You Can’t See: Audit Oversight and the PCAOB Posted by J. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 1:47 am by CMS
In this post, Stephanie Cheung, Mitchell Abbott and Jana Blahova, who all work at CMS, preview the appeal heard by the UK Supreme Court on 2 and 3 November 2020 in the matter of Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On the same date Nicklin J heard an application in the case of Hewson v Times Newspapers. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2015) Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015) Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016) Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015) Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The Supreme Court stated that for a Court to assess the bona fides of a validity challenge to the arbitration agreement that only a Court can resolve requires: (a) First, the court must determine whether, assuming the facts pleaded to be true, there is a genuine challenge to arbitral jurisdiction. [read post]