Search for: "State v. Krantz" Results 81 - 100 of 245
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Based upon case law to date, however, I think we would get the same outcome in the Buckeye State, on facts similar to the facts in Stambovsky v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:05 am
If they had, they would have used contract language that was normal and customary for that purpose” In other words, if you don’t want a party you have given mineral rights to, to strip-mine, clearly state that they cannot extract any such minerals by strip-mining.This blog is presented by Steve Richman, Esq. and Connie Carr, Esq. of Kohrman Jackson & Krantz P.L.L. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Failure to follow this principle cost the buyer in 17 Mile, L.L.C. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
While my story above was hypothetical, the 6th District Court of Appeals in Lucas County held in Ramsdell v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio recently asked itself the same question (as the title to this article asks) in Wellington Resource Group LLC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:30 am by Joy Waltemath
“Non-Asian” does not constitute a “race” for the purposes of Executive Order (EO) 11246 enforcement, ruled a DOL Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in granting summary judgment to a federal contractor in a disparate impact hiring case (OFCCP v VF Jeanswear Ltd Partnership, ALJ Case No 2011-OFC-00006, August 5, 2013, Krantz, K). [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court delivered a victory for property rights in June with its decision in Koontz v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
This blog is presented by Steve Richman, Esq. and Connie Carr, Esq. of Kohrman Jackson & Krantz P.L.L. [read post]