Search for: "State v. MacKenzie"
Results 81 - 100
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Victoria and Richard MacKenzie-Childs (Property, Intangible) TTAB finds service mark application void ab initio for non-use because services were not rendered prior to filing: Parametric Technology Corporation v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 5:12 pm
MacKenzie Trust Co., [1994] O.J. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:52 am
However, the most recent law out of both British Columbia and Ontario is that claims for litigation loan financing and interest are not recoverable [MacKenzie v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
Brinkerhoff, and MacKenzie A. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 1:53 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; and Mackenzie Williams, Student Intern. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 3:30 am
Mackintosh v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 2:44 pm
Mackenzie’s opinion that the prognosis for the resolution of Ms. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm
Noting that this was found to be compatible with Art 8 in Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, Sir Alan Ward also notes that in Yordanova v Bulgaria (Application No. 25446/06, dated 24th April 2012) [our note] the ECtHR said: “However, Article 8 does not impose on Contracting States an obligation to tolerate unlawful land occupation indefinitely…”.Therefore:I conclude that the court must approach the claim made by a private landowner… [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm
Noting that this was found to be compatible with Art 8 in Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, Sir Alan Ward also notes that in Yordanova v Bulgaria (Application No. 25446/06, dated 24th April 2012) [our note] the ECtHR said: “However, Article 8 does not impose on Contracting States an obligation to tolerate unlawful land occupation indefinitely…”.Therefore:I conclude that the court must approach the claim made by a private landowner… [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 2:58 pm
Raffel Systems, LLC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:20 pm
Earnshaw v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In a recent ruling, in Gartner v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:52 am
Mackenzie, 138 U.S. 252 (1891). [read post]
24 May 2012, 9:00 am
In Sentient Jet LLC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
N.A., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 2:19 am
Obrecht, Student Intern; and Mackenzie Williams, Student Intern.Argument by Mr. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
– All-Party Parliamentary IP Group (IPKat) United States US General On hiring an employee of your competitor: Bimbo Bakeries v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:50 pm
IP Holdings v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:02 pm
But having stated reasons for her decision, the judge issued a written judgment from this preliminary hearing. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
The defendant were based in the United States. [read post]
