Search for: "State v. Mathews" Results 81 - 100 of 330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2011, 12:33 pm by Holland & Hart
  The Tenth Circuit explained that, based on a 2009 Supreme Court decision (Penn Plaza v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:47 pm
CAAF's new opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 9:00 pm
  In upholding the Gwinnett County Trial Court's denial of the certificate, the Georgia Court of Appeals hinged its interpretation of Davenport v State (2011) through the lens of Layfield v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:45 pm by Matthew Bush
IllinoisDocket: 11-1192Issue(s): (1) Whether the Due Process Clause requires a state or local government to provide a prompt postseizure probable cause hearing prior to a statutory judicial forfeiture hearing and if so, when any such hearing must take place, whether the proper test for the “prompt” aspect of such a proceeding is governed by the three-part due process analysis of Mathews v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:13 am by Robert Chesney
Feeling the record remained insufficiently developed for her to complete the Mathews v. [read post]
The car owners in this case had argued that due process does give them a right to a prompt hearing under Mathews v. [read post]