Search for: "State v. Pruitt"
Results 81 - 100
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am
After pretty much giving the full “snipe hunt” treatment to Pruitt v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 2:02 pm
Backstrom, and James V. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am
Fellow one-time relist Pruitt v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am
Pruitt, 669 F.3d 1159 (10th Cir. 2012) (ruling against tribal interests in tax dispute with state) Muscogee (Creek) Nation Div. of Housing v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm
State, 2011 Fla. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 5:45 am
The real takeaway from Pruett v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
The presenters were Lisa Pruitt, Suzanne Starr, and Miriam Childs. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 3:33 am
Pruitt and State v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Nebraska and Oklahoma v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
Using the case Bollea v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 4:00 pm
Therefore, in my view, this would unduly burden the defendant's federal and state constitutional rights, which prohibit the use of truly involuntarily obtained statements, by requiring the defendant to forfeit state statutory rights in order to protect constitutional ones. [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:03 am
" City of Cleburne v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:06 pm
See McCleskey v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
Pruitt Eastern District of Tennessee at Greeneville 08b0016p.06 In re: Bettye Zwosta v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Pruitt, the Oklahoma Attorney General, filed his own legal challenge (on behalf of the State of Oklahoma) to the validity of the Clean Water Rule. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Pruitt, the Oklahoma Attorney General, filed his own legal challenge (on behalf of the State of Oklahoma) to the validity of the Clean Water Rule. [read post]
29 May 2013, 4:54 am
Pruitt, supra. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
Even when no federal law exists to conflict with state or local regulation, subnational rules can be unlawful if their burden on interstate commerce is “clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits”—a test the Supreme Court announced in Pike v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:49 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:51 am
I would affirm the trial court's order.In State of Indiana v. [read post]
