Search for: "Stephen Wermiel"
Results 81 - 100
of 113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am
At this blog’s “SCOTUS for law students” feature, Stephen Wermiel discusses the issues in Agency for International Development v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am
” Briefly: At this blog, Stephen Wermiel discusses the tradition and practice of Justices reading their dissents from the bench, as part of his “SCOTUS for law students” series. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:23 am
Stephen Wermiel discusses the petitions in Utah Highway Patrol Association v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 4:35 am
And in his column for law students at this blog, Stephen Wermiel looks even further ahead to the oral argument in McCullen v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
Last summer this blog held a symposium on the case, which Stephen Wermiel also discussed last week in his column for law students and which was also a recent topic of discussion in the blog’s Community. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:08 am
Lyle Denniston previewed the case for this blog and reported on the oral argument; Steve Wermiel also discussed the case in his “SCOTUS for Law Students” column. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:03 am
In his “SCOTUS for law students” feature for this blog, Stephen Wermiel looks at Salinas v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:39 am
On this blog, Stephen Wermiel discusses the case and the issues involved in it as part of the blog’s “SCOTUS for law students” series. [read post]
15 May 2013, 7:48 am
In this blog’s “SCOTUS for law students” column, Stephen Wermiel discusses Justice O’Connor’s recent remarks expressing doubts about the Court’s decision to grant cert. in Bush v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 9:23 am
” “I think they rather demean the process and give it the appearance of an ordinary ward fight in Chicago,” Brennan confided to his biographer, Stephen Wermiel, in a private conversation in his chambers on October 28, 1987, the details of which has not been revealed until now. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:32 am
Lyle previewed the cases for this blog, while Stephen Wermiel of this blog discusses the legal issues in his column for law students. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 8:44 am
As Stephen Wermiel explained nearly three years ago, original-jurisdiction cases are lawsuits – usually, although not always, between two states – filed directly in the Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
Holder, the immigration case in which the Justices will hear oral arguments today. moment hosted a symposium to discuss the influence of religion on the Justices; contributors include Robert Barnes, Dahlia Lithwick, Tony Mauro, Sarah Posner, Stephen Wermiel, Leslie Griffin, Marshall Breger, Emily Bazelon, and this blog’s Lyle Denniston. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
University of Texas, an affirmative action case currently before the Court on a petition for certiorari that SCOTUSblog discussed in its Community section and that Stephen Wermiel analyzed several weeks ago. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
Reviews of Uncertain Justice, a new book on the Roberts Court by Laurence Tribe and Joshua Matz, come from this blog’s Stephen Wermiel, writing for The Washington Post, Jeff Bleich in the Los Angeles Review of Books, and Arthur Bryant at Public Justice. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:21 am
Briefly: Adam Liptak of the New York Times documents the process behind Justice Brennan: Liberal Champion, a biography written on former Supreme Court Justice William Brennan by Stephen Wermiel and Seth Stern. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
In his “SCOTUS for law students” feature for this blog, Stephen Wermiel looks at the implied preemption challenge at issue in Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
In his column for law students for this blog, Stephen Wermiel provides “[a]n introduction to jurisdiction and remedies, through the lens of the health care cases. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am
Last Friday, Stephen Wermiel discussed the constitutional issues in Miller v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am
Briefly: Stephen Wermiel has a new post in this blog’s SCOTUS for law students series, contrasting Fisher v. [read post]
